Run2 with semisapceGC: https://share.firefox.dev/3R1j2G0 I didnt see any difference. First run took 1.4GB, the second run took <200MB.
Bug 1952699 Comment 5 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
Second Run: SemispaceGC enabled: https://share.firefox.dev/3R1j2G0 SemispaceGC disabled: https://share.firefox.dev/3DiN3yd (from comment 0) I didnt see any difference. First run took 1.4GB, the second run took <200MB in both cases
Second Run: SemispaceGC enabled with 100x the loop count: https://share.firefox.dev/4ij6HJm SemispaceGC disabled: https://share.firefox.dev/3DiN3yd (from comment 0) So with semisapceGC enabled, the second run becomes 8x faster?1?!
Second Run: SemispaceGC enabled with 100x the loop count: https://share.firefox.dev/4ij6HJm SemispaceGC disabled: https://share.firefox.dev/3DiN3yd (from comment 0) So with semisapceGC enabled, the second run becomes 8x faster compared to non-semisapceGC?1?!
Second Run: SemispaceGC enabled with 100x(!) the loop count: https://share.firefox.dev/4ij6HJm SemispaceGC disabled: https://share.firefox.dev/3DiN3yd (from comment 0) So with semisapceGC enabled, the second run becomes 8x faster compared to non-semisapceGC?1?!