Closed
Bug 777970
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
Device Storage mochitests on b2g device
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Device Interfaces, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
blocking-basecamp | - |
People
(Reporter: onecyrenus, Assigned: onecyrenus)
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
A mochitest verification that device storage works as expected on a b2g Device
Current Device Storage Tests just verify that device storage works correctly on windows / mac / linux machines.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
This is more of a placeholder, will update further as testing goes along
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
The makefile diff to build this correctly for b2g
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
Doug, initial thoughts ?
Assignee: nobody → dclarke
Attachment #646371 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #649418 -
Flags: review?(doug.turner)
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 649418 [details]
Ready for review
is there any way to reuse the exists mochitests? So, for example, somehow run the mochitests replacing "testing" with each of the ['music','movies','pictures']?
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 649418 [details]
Ready for review
clearing flag.
Attachment #649418 -
Flags: review?(doug.turner)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•13 years ago
|
||
Doug i think the issue here was that there isn't a way to run tests in a device specific manner.
Ex: test_enumerate_mobile will only be run on gonk (b2g devices).
I don't know of a way inside a mochitest to tell it to work in a specific manner on a b2g mobile device.
And I probably wouldn't want to encode device specific information inside the test, as it would take away from readability.
Thought we discussed some of this, but I guess we didn't.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
Nomming for basecamp, as we should have a test that verifies we can read / write to the sdcard.
blocking-basecamp: --- → ?
Comment 8•13 years ago
|
||
We don't block on tests but we do on test infrastructure so this isn't a blocker for basecamp. Of course, it'd be awesome to get tests here :)
blocking-basecamp: ? → -
Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•13 years ago
|
||
I don't think this is going to get worked on at this stage.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•