Closed
Bug 948433
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
PDF.js needs updating to take account of the new <input type=number> support in Firefox 28
Categories
(Firefox :: PDF Viewer, defect)
Firefox
PDF Viewer
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
Firefox 29
People
(Reporter: jwatt, Assigned: jwatt)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
2.79 KB,
patch
|
bdahl
:
review+
lsblakk
:
approval-mozilla-aurora+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
The pref to enable <input type=number> has been flipped for Firefox 28. It seems that PDF.js needs to be updated for that in order to hide the spinner. The mechanism that we've provided to do that is to set |-moz-appearance:textfield| for the <input type=number> instead of the default |-moz-appearance:number-input| that it has.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Pull request at: https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/pull/4020
What's the procedure to get this uplifted for aurora?
Assignee: nobody → jwatt
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
Note that bug 948475 and bug 946184 are also needed to get pdf.js back to looking and behaving as it did/was before the <input type=number> support was enabled.
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
So basically, make a patch from the git commit, get approval, land.
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8345437 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
Review of attachment 8345437 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry I should add to the instructions to remove all the version number changes. It should just be your one line change.
Attachment #8345437 -
Flags: review?(bdahl) → review-
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8345437 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
Review of attachment 8345437 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
r+ pending removal of everything else. (guess there was no point to those steps for this one liner)
Attachment #8345437 -
Flags: review- → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
Thanks for that. Nice not to have to re-request review for something trivial. :)
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/fb0fa2c21392
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 29
| Assignee | ||
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8345437 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
[Approval Request Comment]
Bug caused by (feature/regressing bug #): N/A (or bug 344616 if you need one to blame)
User impact if declined: pdf.js UI will be broken (have an ugly spinner in the page number field)
Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): landed m-i, merged to m-c
Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): low and early
String or IDL/UUID changes made by this patch: none
We're early in the cycle so hopefully this is fine to uplift. Probably needed to keep <input type=number> on in v28.
Attachment #8345437 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8345437 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-mozilla-aurora+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 11•11 years ago
|
||
Target Milestone: Firefox 29 → Firefox 28
| Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
status-firefox28:
--- → fixed
Comment 12•11 years ago
|
||
Let's leave this open until the updated pdf.js hits m-c as well.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
status-firefox29:
--- → affected
Flags: needinfo?(ryanvm)
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Target Milestone: Firefox 28 → Firefox 29
Comment 13•11 years ago
|
||
This already hit m-c, so nevermind. I'll still mark the dependency on the next official "update pdf.js" bug.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago → 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•11 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(ryanvm)
Comment 14•11 years ago
|
||
Are there any known testcases we can use to verify this is fixed?
Flags: needinfo?(jwatt)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 15•11 years ago
|
||
Open any PDF with Firefox's built-in PDF viewer and if the page number field in the UI doesn't have spin buttons then we're good. If this wasn't fixed we'd be getting more bug reports though, so I think we're good.
Flags: needinfo?(jwatt)
Comment 16•11 years ago
|
||
Verified as fixed on the latest Firefox 28.0a2 and Firefox 29.0a1 (January 26th and 27th builds), on Windows 7 64bit, Mac OS X 10.7.5 and Ubuntu 13.04 32bit (reproduced the issue on older Aurora and Nightly builds before verifying the fix).
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Keywords: verifyme
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•